T. Mortensen & J. Walker, 'Blogging thoughts: personal publication as an online research tool' (pdf)
in A. Morrison (ed), Researching ICTs in context, InterMedia Report, 3/2002, Oslo, 2002.
Authors: T. Mortensen, Volda College and J. Walker, University of Bergen.
The authors examine weblogs as a tool for aiding academic research.
They look at weblogs as methods of publishing research and ideas as they develop.
They see weblogs as “connecting dispersed discoveries”. This relates to the idea of clusters of topical blogs.
Evan Williams (one of the creators of Blogger): "I realised early on that what was significant about blogs was the format – not the content". (As quoted on p.249)
Blogs are more than journals – "a hybrid between journal, academic publishing, storage space for link and site for academic discourse". (p.250)
About exchange of information. "A weblogger filters a mass of information, choosing the items that interest her or that are relevant to her chosen topic, commenting upon them, demonstrating connections between them and analysing them". (p.250)
Bloggers – journalists, editors and researchers in one. Directing others, trailblazing (see below).
Online presence useful – gives credibility if researching online matters.
Authors' methodology: research from the inside, personal experience, 'Action Research' – problem of lack of distance between researcher and object of study, no detached observation.
Lack of published material (in 2002). Blogs being treated as part of popular culture or as 'folk journalism'.
Note projects exploring weblogs in education: Weblogs in Education, Edublog, Weblogg-Ed – focus on practical use of blogs in teaching.
"Many professionals keep weblogs, and they often use their blogs to reflect upon their work, to follow developments in the field and to publish ideas". (p.252) Weblogs very much about research.
Blogdex – indexes links in blogs, looks at connections between blogs – plots social networks. Interlinked nature of blogs.
Blogging software.
Blogs – "straddle the boundaries between publication and process". (p.256) They allow "single, small, insignificant ideas to be expressed and formulated [...] ideas grow. Someone links their site to the first post, comments on it, and a conversation grows forth [...] Links are like roots, tendrils, reaching out between fragments, creating a context for bits and pieces that at first glance may seem to be unconnected fragments". (p.259)
Blogs – "written to share experiences rather than just display them". (p.261)
Public/private spheres.
Subjective nature. Don't necessarily go with consensus, e.g. 11 September 2001, "weblogs showed the dissent among individuals". (p.259)
Changing nature of academic communication, as more information is available.
Mismatch between protecting academic thought until publishing and blogging as you go along.
H. Jenkins, 'Blog this': "objectification and alienation" of bloggers. Jenkins needed blog presence in order to defend his position. 'Problem' of bloggers analysing the researcher.
Blogging and conferences – immediacy of the medium.
Trail blazing – "establishing useful trails through the enormous mass of the common record" (Vannevar Bush, 'As we may think', as quoted on p.265)
"connecting dispersed discoveries" (p.265)
"a weblog allows us to share this found information, and to participate in discussions about it" (p.265) – about research and dissemination of research.
Conversations between blogs.
Sponteneity of publishing – minimal editing – less formal tone.
"Most ideas a researcher has never make it to a formal article or book; they are forgotten or cast aside because they don't fit the whole. Weblogs elucidate the constant flow of thought and the ever-changing nature of research". (p.267)
"The idea that some kinds of knowledge are discarded because they do not fit into the stable formulas [sic] of a genre could be applied to both weblogs and to the scholarly article or book". (p.271)
"a visible trace of the process of research" (p.268)
Rebecca Blood, (Rebecca's pocket) – history of blogging article. Blogs good for finding voice and defining own interests.
Archive and searchable.
How do you measure what is a 'good blog'? Popularity (i.e. links from other blogs)? Weblog clusters which link to each other. A-list cluster (people like Rebecca Blood, Evan Williams etc). Distortion?
Cameron Marlow (Blogdex developer) – social networks between blogs.
"highly social nature of weblogging" (p.272)
"In the semi-social structure of weblogs, linking is a measure of popularity, which again is generally interpreted as a measure of quality". (p.272)
(Apologies for the excessive quoting – it's a good article!)